UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.  20549

                                 FORM 10-K

[X]  Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934
                 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
                        Commission file number 1-9735

                           BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           DELAWARE                                 77-0079387
(State of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

                           28700 Hovey Hills Road
                           Taft, California 93268
      (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (805) 769-8811

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                                      Name of each exchange
            Title of each class                       on which registered
   Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value              New York Stock Exchange
(including associated stock purchase rights) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all 
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such 
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), 
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 
days.  YES [X]  NO [  ]

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant 
to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be 
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy 
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

     As of February 20, 1998, the registrant had 21,101,720 shares of 
Class A Common Stock outstanding and the aggregate market value of the 
voting stock held by nonaffiliates was approximately $225,744,000.  
This calculation is based on the closing price of the shares on the New 
York Stock Exchange on February 20, 1998 of $16.125.  The registrant 
also had 898,892 shares of Class B Stock outstanding on February 20, 
1998, all of which is held by an affiliate of the registrant.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Part III is incorporated by reference from the registrant's 
definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be 
filed, pursuant to Regulation 14A, no later than 120 days after the 
close of the registrant's fiscal year.








2 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Oil Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Steaming Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Environmental and Other Regulations . . . . . . . . . . 5 Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Divestiture of Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Oil and Gas Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Enhanced Oil Recovery Tax Credits . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Oil and Gas Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Acreage and Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Drilling Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Title and Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Item 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. . . . 10 Executive Officers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . 14 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . 18 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . 37 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . 37 Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . 37 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 2

3 PART I Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties General Berry Petroleum Company, ("Berry" or "Company"), is an independent energy company engaged in the production, development, acquisition, exploitation, exploration and marketing of crude oil and natural gas. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and has been a publicly traded company since 1987. Berry's principal reserves and producing properties are located in Kern and Ventura Counties in California. Information contained in this report on Form 10-K reflects the business of the Company during the year ended December 31, 1997. The Company's corporate headquarters are located on its properties in the South Midway-Sunset field, near Taft, California and Management believes the current facilities are adequate. The Company's mission is to increase shareholder wealth, primarily through maximizing the value and cash flow of the Company's assets. To achieve this, Berry's corporate strategy is to remain a low cost producer and to grow the Company's asset base strategically. To increase production, the Company will compete to acquire primarily proved reserves with exploitation potential and will focus on the further development of its existing properties by application of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods, developmental drilling, well completions and remedial work. Berry believes that its primary strengths are its ability to maintain a low cost operation and its flexibility in acquiring attractive producing properties which have significant exploitation and enhancement potential. While the Company is not currently involved in exploration activities, the Company may investigate and pursue a focused exploration program in the future. The Company has substantial unused borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions and will consider, as appropriate, the issuance of capital stock to finance future purchases. Proved Reserves As of December 31, 1997, the Company's estimated proved reserves were 101 million barrels of oil equivalent, (BOE), of which 99.4% is crude oil. The majority of these proved reserves are owned in fee. Substantially all of the Company's reserves are located in California with 94.4% and 5.5% of total reserves in Kern and Ventura Counties, respectively. The Company's reserves have a long life, in excess of 20 years, which is primarily a result of the Company's strong position in heavy crude oil (the Company's properties in the Midway-Sunset field average 13 degree API gravity and the Montalvo field averages 16 degree API gravity). Production in 1997 was 4.6 million BOE, up 28% from 1996 production of 3.6 million BOE. For the five years 1993 through 1997, the Company's average reserve replacement rate was 245% at a cost of $2.81 per BOE. Operations The Midway-Sunset field contains predominantly heavy crude oil, the production of which depends substantially on steam injection. Berry utilizes primary and cyclic steaming recovery methods in this field and utilizes primary recovery methods at its Montalvo field. Berry operates all of its principal oil producing properties. Field operations include the initial recovery of the crude oil and its transport through treating facilities into storage tanks. After the treating process is completed, which includes removal of water and solids by mechanical, thermal and chemical processes, the crude oil is metered through Lease Automatic Custody Transfer (LACT) units and transferred into crude oil pipelines owned by other companies. The point-of-sale is usually at the LACT unit. 3

4 Revenues The percentage of revenues by source for the prior three years is as follows: 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Sales of oil and gas 97% 97% 89% Interest and other income 3% 3% 11% Oil Marketing The market for hydrocarbons continues to be quite volatile. California crude oil pricing fundamentals have improved since Alaska North Slope crude oil became available for export in mid-1996, and because of declining Alaska production. These combined factors are contributing to the reduction of the excess crude supply in the California market, thus strengthening California prices relative to West Texas Intermediate (WTI) prices. Although the spread has widened in recent months, over the last several years California heavy crude oil prices have increased as a percentage of WTI, from approximately 60% in 1990 to approximately 75% in both 1996 and 1997. Furthermore, a strengthened California economy is providing for increased petroleum product demand while, at the same time, past refinery investments have resulted in higher demand for the heavy barrel. The California downstream sector (refineries) has recently been involved in mergers, combinations, or realignments, and the impact on producers' prices is unknown at this time. Refinery upsets (fires, explosions, extended turnarounds, etc.) can impact local crude prices, for limited times, by weakening crude demand. Principally, as a result of large investments required by the refinery industry in California to meet product specifications and clean air regulations, the number of refineries has decreased. Average refinery utilization has increased from approximately 75% to 95% over the past decade and, therefore, any individual refinery disruption has a more pronounced impact on downstream crude oil demand. The Company may enter into crude oil or natural gas hedge contracts depending upon various factors including Management's view of future crude oil markets. Berry's 1997 average heavy crude oil sales price per barrel was $14.70, down $.72 per barrel, or 5%, from $15.42 in 1996 (both years are net of any hedging). The Company currently has a hedge contract for 3,000 barrels per day (B/D) with a California independent refiner which expires on August 31, 1998. Management of the Company does not believe that the loss of any single customer or contract would materially affect its business. There are no significant delivery commitments and substantially all of the Company's oil and gas production is sold under short-term contracts at current market prices. Steaming Operations Approximately 94% of the Company's proved reserves, or 95 million barrels, consist of heavy crude oil produced from depths less than 2000'. This heavy crude oil requires heat in the form of steam to be injected into the oil producing formations to reduce the oil viscosity and allow the oil to flow to the well-bore for production. As is typical in EOR operations, steam represents the highest cost component of operating expenses. The Company, in achieving its goal of being a low cost heavy oil producer, has focused on reducing its steam cost by the purchase of two gas-fired cogeneration facilities in 1995 and 1996. Steam generation from these facilities is more efficient than conventional steam generators, as both steam and electricity are produced from the same natural gas fuel supply. Another significant benefit is that the prices received upon the sale of electricity are currently based on natural gas prices. As natural gas prices fluctuate, so does the electricity revenue; thus, the Company's steam cost is substantially hedged against higher natural gas prices. As the California electric industry deregulates, this relationship will change and electricity revenues will be impacted by other factors in addition to natural gas prices and, consequently, the Company's steam costs will be more volatile. Proceeds received from the sale of electricity produced by the Company's cogeneration facilities are reported as a reduction in operating costs. 4

5 For its South Midway-Sunset properties, the Company's current steam production is generated by its 38 and 18 megawatt cogeneration facilities (approximately 18,500 barrels of steam per day (BSPD)) and, as needed, from conventional steam generators. In addition, the Company made modifications to use the duct-firing capability of its 38 megawatt facility to produce up to an additional 4,500 BSPD available for delivery to its South Midway-Sunset properties. Conventional steam generation is used by the Company at its South Midway-Sunset properties only as required to maintain current production levels, when additional steam injection is expected to economically produce additional crude oil and as emergency back-up steam generation to the cogeneration facilities. On its North Midway-Sunset properties, the Company relies solely on conventional steam generators for its steam requirements. The Company has ample productive steam capacity for its requirements at both core areas. Current oil prices, near-term oil price expectations and natural gas prices are the primary factors determining steam levels generated from conventional generators. Due to low oil prices occurring in early 1998, the Company temporarily has shut down the duct-firing steam capacity and all conventional steam generators at South Midway-Sunset to reduce costs and improve cash flow. The Company's two cogeneration facilities sold electricity to a large California-based utility under Standard Offer #2 (SO2) contracts in 1996. The SO2 contract for the 38 megawatt facility expired on January 16, 1997, while the contract for the 18 megawatt facility does not expire until January 31, 2002. The SO2 contract for the 38 megawatt facility has been replaced by a 15-year Standard Offer #1 (SO1) contract effective January 16, 1997, which resulted in lower electricity revenues for the 38 megawatt facility. However, under the SO1 contract, the Company will continue to receive Short Run Avoided Cost pricing plus a portion of the proceeds related to available capacity that were received in prior years. Deregulation of the electricity generation market in California may have a positive or negative impact on the Company's future electricity revenues, however, the Company believes, at a minimum, that continued steam generation from cogeneration facilities will be significantly more efficient and cost effective than conventional steam generation. The Company has physical access to gas pipelines, such as the Kern River/El Paso and Southern California Gas Company systems, to transport its gas purchases required for steam generation. Prior to February 1997, natural gas purchases for the 38 megawatt cogeneration facility were subject to a long-term gas transportation agreement which required the Company to pay above-market transportation rates for a substantial portion of the facility's gas requirements. However, this contract expired and, as a result, the Company experienced substantial reductions in its gas transportation costs beginning in 1997. Environmental and Other Regulations The operations of Berry are affected by federal, state, regional and local laws and regulations, including laws governing allowable rates of production, well spacing, air emissions, water discharges, endangered species, marketing, pricing, taxes and other laws relating to the petroleum industry. Berry is further affected by changes in such laws and by constantly changing administrative regulations. The Company's oil and gas operations and properties are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the amounts and types of substances and materials that may be released into the environment, the issuance of permits in connection with drilling and production activities, the discharge and disposition of waste materials, the reclamation and abandonment of wells and facility sites and the remediation of contaminated sites. In addition, these laws and regulations may impose substantial liabilities for the Company's failure to comply with them or for any contamination resulting from the Company's operations. Berry has established policies and procedures for continuing compliance with environmental laws and regulations affecting its production. The costs incurred to comply with these laws and regulations are inextricably connected to normal operating expenses such that the Company is unable to separate the expenses related to environmental matters; however, the Company does not believe any such additional future expenses are material to its financial position or results of operations. 5

6 Although environmental requirements do have a substantial impact upon the energy industry, generally these requirements do not appear to affect the Company any differently, or to any greater or lesser extent, than other companies in California and in the domestic industry as a whole. Berry believes that compliance with environmental laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or financial condition but there can be no assurances that changes in or additions to laws or regulations regarding the protection of the environment will not have such an impact in the future. Berry maintains insurance coverage which it believes is customary in the industry, although it is not fully insured against all environmental risks. The Company is not aware of any environmental claims existing as of December 31, 1997, which would have a material impact upon the Company's financial position or results of operations. Competition The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. As an independent producer, the Company does not own any refining or retail outlets and, therefore, it has little control over the price it receives for its crude oil. As such, higher costs, fees and taxes assessed at the producer level cannot necessarily be passed on to the Company's customers. In acquisition activities, significant competition exists since integrated companies, independent companies and individual producers and operators are active bidders for desirable oil and gas properties. Although many of these competitors have greater financial and other resources than the Company, Management believes that it is in a position to compete effectively due to its low cost structure, transaction flexibility, strong financial position and experience. Employees On December 31, 1997, the Company had 99 full-time employees. Divestiture of Properties In 1997, the Company sold its non-operated interests in Louisiana and its California San Joaquin Valley "Eastside" properties for a combined total of $1.5 million, and recorded a pre-tax gain of $.8 million. On the sale date, the Company had recorded reserves of 26,000 BOE associated with these properties. The Company disposed of these properties due to limited exploitation potential and high operating costs. Oil and Gas Properties Development South Midway-Sunset - Berry owns and operates working interests in eighteen properties consisting of 1,730 acres located in the South Midway-Sunset field. The Company estimates these properties account for approximately 82% of the Company's proved oil and gas reserves and approximately 86% of its current daily production. Twelve of these properties are owned in fee. The wells produce from an average depth of approximately 1200'. These properties rely on thermal EOR methods, primarily cyclic steaming. During 1997, the primary focus on this field was directed at the integration of the recently acquired Formax and Tannehill properties into the Company's operations. Of the 76 new wells drilled in 1997 in this area, 54 were drilled on these newly acquired properties. In addition, during 1996 and 1997, the Company drilled a total of 4 horizontal wells in this field. The Company's objectives related to using this developing technology were to improve ultimate recovery of original oil-in-place, reduce the development and operating costs of the properties and accelerate production. The Company has obtained favorable results to date from these wells with current production of approximately 81 B/D each. With the drilling of these wells and the remedial work and workovers completed on 70 existing wells, the Company increased production approximately 36% during 1997 to 10,428 B/D. Included in the 1996 purchase of the Tannehill properties was the 18 megawatt cogeneration facility which has provided the Company with an additional 5,500 B/D of low cost steam used in its thermal EOR process. In 1998, the Company plans to drill an additional 42 development wells in this field, 5 of which will be horizontal wells. 6

7 North Midway-Sunset - Berry owns and operates approximately 1,975 acres in the North Midway-Sunset field which account for approximately 9% of the Company's proved oil and gas reserves and 8% of daily production. These properties also rely on thermally enhanced oil recovery methods, primarily cyclic steaming. Berry's interests consist of four fee properties comprising 1,009 acres and eight leases comprising 966 acres. The wells produce from an average depth of approximately 1200'. During 1997, the Company drilled 13 development wells to maintain productive capacity and develop proved reserves. During 1998, the Company plans to drill an additional 20 development wells in this area. In addition, the Company has budgeted 3 intermediate depth exploitation wells to evaluate the Antelope Shale and other diatomaceous shale intervals. Montalvo - Berry owns 100% working interest in six leases in Ventura County, California in the Montalvo field. The State of California is the lessor for two of the six leases. The Company estimates current proved reserves from Montalvo account for approximately 6% of Berry's proved oil and gas reserves. Total production from these leases, comprised of 8,563 acres, represents approximately 6% of Berry's total current daily oil and gas production. The wells produce from an average depth of approximately 12,500'. No new wells were drilled in 1997 or 1996. The following is a summary of capital expenditures incurred during 1997 and 1996 and projected capital expenditures for 1998: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES SUMMARY (in thousands) 1998(1) 1997 1996(2) --------- --------- --------- (Projected) South Midway-Sunset Field New wells $ 5,095 $ 10,078 $ 4,099 Remedials/workovers 1,070 1,695 499 Facilities 1,620 3,180 317 Cogeneration facilities - 208 1,134 ------ ------ ------ 7,785 15,161 6,049 ------ ------ ------ North Midway-Sunset Field New wells 3,980 1,719 936 Remedials/workovers 130 251 213 Facilities 495 336 124 ------ ------ ------ 4,605 2,306 1,273 ------ ------ ------ Other 1,087 1,130 1,911 ------ ------ ------ Totals $ 13,477 $ 18,597 $ 9,233 ====== ====== ====== (1) Budgeted capital expenditures may be adjusted for numerous reasons including, but not limited to, results of drilling and oil price levels. See the Future Developments section of Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (2) Excludes the acquisition of properties and the 18 megawatt cogeneration facility from Tannehill Electric Company. 7

8 Exploration The Company did not participate in the drilling of any exploratory wells in 1997 or 1996 and has none budgeted in 1998. Although the Company has significantly reduced its exploration program since 1994 to concentrate on growth through development of existing assets and strategic acquisitions, as well as through improving profitability, the Company may investigate and pursue a focused exploration program in the future. Enhanced Oil Recovery Tax Credits In 1990, President Bush signed into law the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990 which included a tax credit for certain costs associated with extracting high-cost marginal oil which utilizes at least one of nine designated "enhanced" or tertiary recovery methods. Cyclic steam and steam drive recovery methods, which Berry utilizes extensively, are qualifying EOR methods. Hydrocarbons produced from primary or other secondary recovery methods are not eligible for the credit. In 1996, California conformed to the federal law thus, on a combined basis, the Company is able to achieve credits approximating 12% of its qualifying costs. The credit is earned by investing in a qualified EOR project which includes three distinct costs: (1) drilling new wells, (2) adding facilities that are integrally related to qualified production, and (3) utilizing a tertiary injectant, such as steam, to produce oil. This credit is significant in reducing the Company's income tax liabilities and effective tax rate. Oil and Gas Reserves Reserve Reports - The Company continued to engage DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M) to estimate the proved oil and gas reserves and the future net revenues to be derived from properties of the Company for the three years ended December 31, 1997 for all of the Company's properties. D&M is an independent oil and gas consulting firm located in Dallas, Texas. In preparing their reports, D&M reviewed and examined geologic, economic, engineering and other data provided by the Company considered applicable to each reserve report. They also examined the reasonableness of certain economic assumptions regarding forecasted operating and development costs and recovery rates in light of the economic environment on December 31, 1997. For the Company's operated properties, these reserve estimates are filed annually with the U.S. Department of Energy. Refer to the Supplemental Information About Oil & Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited) for the Company's oil and gas reserve disclosures. Production The following table sets forth certain information regarding production for the years ended December 31, as indicated: 1997 1996 1995 Net annual production(1): ------ ------ ------ Oil (Mbbls) 4,503 3,491 3,277 Gas (Mmcf) 282 491 611 Total equivalent barrels(2) 4,550 3,573 3,379 Average sales price: Oil (per bbl) $ 14.70 $ 15.42 $ 13.56 Gas (per mcf) 2.68 1.99 1.50 Per BOE 14.71 15.36 13.48 Average production cost (per BOE) 4.92 4.92 5.41 (1) Net production represents that owned by Berry and produced to its interest, less royalty and other similar interests. (2) Equivalent oil and gas information is at a ratio of 6 thousand cubic feet (mcf) of natural gas to 1 barrel (bbl) of oil. 8

9 Acreage and Wells At December 31, 1997, the Company's properties accounted for the following developed and undeveloped acres: Developed Acres Undeveloped Acres --------------- ----------------- Gross Net Gross Net ----- ----- ----- ----- California 6,293 6,292 6,846 6,846 Other 1,010 174 - - ------ ------ ------ ------ 7,303 6,466 6,846 6,846 ====== ====== ====== ====== Gross acres represent all acres in which Berry has a working interest; net acres represent Berry's aggregate working interests in the gross acres. Berry currently has 2,048 gross oil wells (2,037 net) and 5 gross gas wells (3.3 net). Gross wells represent the total number of wells in which Berry has a working interest. Net wells represent the number of gross wells multiplied by the percentages of the working interests owned by Berry. One or more completions in the same bore hole are counted as one well. Any well in which one of the multiple completions is an oil completion is classified as an oil well. Drilling Activity The following table sets forth certain information regarding Berry's drilling activities for the periods indicated: 1997 1996 1995 -------------- ------------- ------------- Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Exploratory wells drilled: Productive 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Dry(1) 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.7 Development wells drilled: Productive 89 88.9 46 45.1 44 44.0 Dry(1) 1 1 3 2.1 1 1.0 Total wells drilled: Productive 89 88.9 46 45.1 44 44.0 Dry(1) 1 1 3 2.1 5 1.7 (1) A dry well is a well found to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well Title and Insurance The Company is not aware of any defect in the title to any of its principal properties. Notwithstanding the absence of a recent title opinion or title insurance policy, the Company believes it has satisfactory title to these properties, subject to such exceptions as the Company believes are customary and usual in the oil and gas industry and which the Company believes will not materially impair its ability to recover the proved oil and gas reserves or to obtain the resulting economic benefits. Title insurance was obtained by the Company on the Tannehill and Formax properties upon their acquisition in 1996. The oil and gas business can be hazardous, involving unforeseen circumstances such as blowouts or environmental damage. Although it is not insured against all risks, the Company maintains a comprehensive insurance program to address the hazards inherent in the oil and gas business. 9

10 Item 3. Legal Proceedings In 1993, the Company incurred an oil spill on its Montalvo properties. In early 1997, the Company reached a final settlement with the appropriate federal and state agencies. Management believes that its prior accruals have been adequate and that any remaining charges or income will be immaterial to the Company. The Company is a party to certain lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect such matters to have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. 10

11 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Listed below are the names, ages (as of December 31, 1997) and positions of the executive officers of Berry and their business experience during at least the past five years. All officers of the Company are elected in May of each year at an organizational meeting of the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between any executive officers and members of the Board of Directors. JERRY V. HOFFMAN, 48, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hoffman has been President and Chief Executive Officer since May 1994 and President and Chief Operating Officer from March 1992 until May 1994. Mr. Hoffman was added to the Board of Directors in March 1992 and named Chairman on March 21, 1997. Mr. Hoffman held the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer positions from January 1988 until March 1992. Mr. Hoffman, a CPA, has held a variety of other positions with the Company and its predecessors since February 1985. DONALD A. DALE, 51, Controller since December 1985. Mr. Dale, a CPA, was the Controller for Berry Holding Company from September 1985 to December 1985. RALPH J. GOEHRING, 41, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Goehring has been Senior Vice President since April 1997, Chief Financial Officer since March 1992 and was Manager of Taxation from September 1987 until March 1992. Mr. Goehring, a CPA, is also the Assistant Secretary for Berry Petroleum Company. KENNETH A. OLSON, 42, Corporate Secretary since December 1985 and Treasurer since August 1988. Mr. Olson, a CPA, has held a variety of other positions with the Company and its predecessors since July 1985. BRIAN L. REHKOPF, 50, Manager of Engineering since September 1997, joined the Company's engineering department in June 1997. Mr. Rehkopf, a registered petroleum engineer, was previously a Vice President and Asset Manager with ARCO Western Energy, a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Corp. (ARCO) since 1992 and an Operations Engineering Supervisor with ARCO from 1988 to 1992. MICHAEL R. STARZER, 36, Vice President of Corporate Development since March 1996 and Manager of Corporate Development since April 1995. Mr. Starzer, a registered petroleum engineer, was with Unocal from August 1983 to May 1991 and from August 1993 to April 1995. Mr. Starzer was an engineering consultant and worked with the California State Lands Commission from May 1991 to August 1993. STEVEN J. THOMAS, 47, passed away February 21, 1998. Mr. Thomas was Manager of Production from March 1993 until his death. Mr. Thomas joined the Company's engineering department in September 1992. Mr. Thomas, a registered petroleum engineer, was an engineering and petroleum consultant from 1990 to 1992 and was employed by Chevron USA from 1979 to 1990 in various drilling, production and facilities engineering positions. 11

12 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters Shares of Class A Common Stock (Common Stock) and Class B Stock, referred to collectively as the "Capital Stock", are each entitled to one vote and 95% of one vote, respectively. Each share of Class B Stock is entitled to a $1.00 per share preference in the event of liquidation or dissolution. Further, each share of Class B Stock is convertible into one share of Common Stock at the option of the holder. In 1989, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Agreement and declared a dividend distribution of one such Right for each outstanding share of Capital Stock on December 22, 1989. Each share of Capital Stock issued after December 22, 1989 includes one Right. The Rights expire on December 8, 1999. See Note 7 of Notes to the Financial Statements. In conjunction with the acquisition of Tannehill in 1996, the Company issued a Warrant Certificate to the beneficial owners of Tannehill Oil Company. This Warrant authorizes the purchase of 100,000 shares of Berry Petroleum Company Class A Common Stock until November 8, 2003 at $14.06 per share. All the warrants are currently outstanding and the underlying shares will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Berry's Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "BRY". The Class B Stock is not publicly traded. The market data and dividends for 1997 and 1996 are shown below: 1997 1996 --------------------------- ----------------------------- Price Range Dividends Price Range Dividends High Low per Share High Low per Share -------- ------ --------- -------- ------ --------- First Quarter $ 15 7/8 $ 14 $ .10 $ 11 1/8 $ 8 3/4 $ .10 Second Quarter 19 13 7/8 .10 12 1/2 10 3/8 .10 Third Quarter 20 1/2 16 3/16 .10 11 3/4 10 3/8 .10 Fourth Quarter 21 3/8 17 .10 14 1/2 11 1/4 .10 The closing price per share of Berry's Common Stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transaction Reporting System for February 20, 1998, December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996 was $16.125, $17.4375 and $14.375, respectively. The number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock was 926 (and approximately 3,000 street name shareholders) as of February 20, 1998. There was one Class B Stockholder of record as of February 20, 1998. The Company paid cash dividends for many years prior to the roll-up of the various Berry companies into Berry Petroleum Company on December 16, 1985. Since Berry's formation, the Company has paid dividends on its Common Stock for eight consecutive semi-annual periods through September 1989 and for 33 consecutive quarters through December 31, 1997. The Company intends to continue the payment of dividends, although future dividend payments will depend upon the Company's level of earnings, operating cash flow, capital commitments and other relevant factors. At December 31, 1997, dividends declared on 4,041,400 shares of certain Common Stock are restricted, whereby 37.5% of the dividends declared on these shares are paid by the Company to the surviving member of a group of individuals, the B group, for as long as this remaining member shall live. 12

13 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to the Company and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the historical financial statements and notes thereto of the Company included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." The statement of operations and balance sheet data included in this table for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 1997 were derived from the audited financial statements and the accompanying notes to those financial statements (in thousands, except per share and per barrel data): 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 Statement of Operations ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Data: Sales of oil and gas $ 67,172 $ 55,264 $ 45,773 $ 39,451 $ 42,843 Operating costs 22,407 17,587 18,264 21,224 23,790 General and administrative expenses (G&A) 5,907 4,820 4,578 5,118 5,999 Depreciation, depletion & amortization(DD&A) 10,138 7,323 6,847 7,270 9,983 Net income (loss) 19,260 17,546 12,203 (1,129) 32 Basic net income (loss) per share .88 .80 .56 (.05) - Weighted average number of shares outstanding 21,976 21,939 21,932 21,932 21,926 Balance Sheet Data: Working capital $ 11,499 $ 7,850 $ 36,506 $ 38,273 $ 40,418 Total assets 177,724 176,403 117,722 118,254 135,519 Long-term debt 32,000 36,000 - - - Shareholders' equity 111,871 101,009 92,060 88,632 98,323 Cash dividends per share .40 .40 .40 .40 .55 Operating Data: Cash flow from operations 31,401 29,182 17,070 14,579 10,957 Capital expenditures (excluding acquisitions)18,597 15,616 14,569 5,911 13,983 Property acquisitions - 69,330 503 1,023 - Per BOE: Sales price $ 14.71 $ 15.36 $ 13.48 $ 11.60 $ 11.43 Operating costs 4.92 4.92 5.41 6.28 6.35 G&A 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.51 1.60 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Cash flow 8.49 9.09 6.72 3.81 3.48 DD&A 2.23 2.05 2.03 2.15 2.67 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Operating income $ 6.26 $ 7.04 $ 4.69 $ 1.66 $ .81 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Production (BOE) 4,550 3,573 3,379 3,382 3,746 Proved Reserves Information: Total BOE 101,043 102,116 78,068 77,084 72,991 Present value (PV10) of estimated future cash flow before income taxes $376,459 $634,579 $308,370 $263,890 $ 50,124 Year end BOE price for PV10 purposes 12.19 18.37 13.39 12.49 8.25 Other: Return on average shareholders' equity 18.1% 18.2% 13.6% (1.2)% 0% Return on average total assets 10.9% 13.3% 10.5% (0.9)% 0% Total debt/total debt plus equity 22.2% 29.8% N/A N/A N/A 13

14 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion provides information on the results of operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 1997 and the financial condition, liquidity and capital resources as of December 31, 1997. The financial statements and the notes thereto contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion. The profitability of the Company's operations in any particular accounting period will be directly related to the average realized prices of oil and gas sold, the type and volume of oil and gas produced and the results of acquisition, development, exploitation and exploration activities. The average realized prices for oil and gas will fluctuate from one period to another due to world and regional market conditions and other factors. The aggregate amount of oil and gas produced may fluctuate based on the success of development and exploitation of oil and gas reserves pursuant to current reservoir management. Production rates, steam costs, labor, maintenance expenses and production taxes are expected to be the principal influences on operating costs. Accordingly, the results of operations of the Company may fluctuate from period to period based on the foregoing principal factors, among others. Results of Operations Net income for 1997 was $19.3 million, up 10%, or $1.8 million, from $17.5 million in 1996 and 58%, or $7.1 million, from $12.2 million in 1995. For the fourth quarter of 1997, net income was $4.7 million, down 11% from $5.3 million in the fourth quarter of 1996, but up 27% from $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 1995. Although production on the Company's core assets has continued to increase, profitability decreased from the third quarter of 1997 due to lower oil prices and higher operating costs. The following table presents certain operating data for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 for comparative purposes: 1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Net production - BOE per day 12,465 9,762 9,258 Per BOE: Average sales price $14.71 $15.36 $13.48 Operating costs* 4.24 4.44 4.96 Production taxes 0.68 0.48 0.45 Total operating costs 4.92 4.92 5.41 DD&A 2.23 2.05 2.03 G&A 1.30 1.35 1.35 * Excluding production taxes. Operating income from producing operations was $35.0 million in 1997, up $4.3 million from $30.7 million in 1996 and up $15.9 million from $19.1 million in 1995. The improvement from 1996 was primarily due to higher production volumes, partially offset by both higher DD&A and production taxes, and lower oil prices. The average sales price/BOE received of $14.71 in 1997 was 4% lower than the $15.36 received in 1996, but 9% higher than the $13.48 received in 1995. Recently, worldwide oil prices have declined sharply with average postings for Midway-Sunset field crude oil at $7.13 per barrel as of March 9, 1998. Oil and gas production was 12,465 BOE/day, up 28% from 9,762 BOE/day in 1996 and up 35% from 9,258 BOE/day in 1995. The increase in production was due primarily to the 1997 drilling and development program and increased steam volumes related to the properties acquired in the fourth quarter of 1996. Total production from the Formax and Tannehill properties purchased in the fourth quarter of 1996 has increased to approximately 3,900 BOE/day at the end of 1997 from approximately 2,200 BOE/day upon acquisition. 14

15 The Company has a hedge contract for 3,000 B/D of the Company's crude production with a California refiner to help protect the Company's revenue from declines in the price of crude oil. The current contract was initiated in February 1997 and expires on August 31, 1998. The current price of California heavy crude oil is considerably under the lower threshold of the contract, therefore, the Company anticipates that its revenues per barrel will be beneficially impacted under the terms of the contract, if the low price levels continue. Operating costs per BOE in 1997 of $4.92 were equal to $4.92 in 1996 and 9% lower than $5.41 in 1995. The Formax properties were produced by our predecessor at reservoir temperatures below the temperature conditions on the Company's adjacent properties. To improve production levels, the Company provided additional heat to the reservoir by firing several conventional generators in addition to its cogeneration facilities to increase the volume of injected steam. However, the cost of conventionally generated steam is more expensive than the steam produced by the Company's two cogeneration plants. Therefore, the cost of steam and the volume injected increased in 1997 compared to 1996. On a per barrel basis, the Company more than offset this increased steam cost by reducing other lifting costs. Production taxes per BOE have increased $.20, or 42%, in 1997 compared to 1996 due primarily to the 1996 acquisitions and significantly higher pricing assumptions used by Kern County to calculate the 1997/1998 property taxes. The Company expects lower production taxes in 1998, in both real terms and on a BOE basis, primarily due to the current low oil price environment and higher anticipated production. Although total operating costs increased, operating costs/BOE were equal to the 1996 level due to higher production volumes in 1997. The Company anticipates that its operating cost per BOE will trend lower in 1998 due to increased production, lower production taxes and continuing operating cost efficiencies. DD&A per BOE increased to $2.23 in 1997, up from $2.05 and $2.03 in 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase was due primarily to the 1996 property acquisitions and increased drilling activity in 1996 and 1997. The Company expects that its DD&A cost per BOE will stay relatively flat to slightly higher in 1998. In 1997, the Company completed the sale of its California San Joaquin Valley "Eastside" non-core properties located in the Poso Creek and Kern Front fields and certain non-operated interests in Louisiana for a total of $1.5 million. The Company disposed of these properties due to limited exploitation potential and high operating costs. In the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company acquired the producing properties of Tannehill Oil Company and Formax Oil Company, which are adjacent to the Company's core South Midway-Sunset properties. At the time of the acquisitions, the properties produced approximately 2,250 barrels per day of 13 degree API gravity crude oil. As of December 31, 1997, production from these properties had increased to approximately 3,900 B/D, exceeding the Company's stated goal of 3,500 B/D. General Interest and dividend income in 1997 was $.6 million, down from $2.1 million and $2.0 million in 1996 and 1995, respectively. In addition, interest expense for 1997 was $2.3 million, up significantly from $.2 million in 1996 and $0 in 1995. The Company did not capitalize any interest in 1997 or 1996. These fluctuations were due to the use of cash and debt to finance the acquisitions made in the fourth quarter of 1996. Total debt at December 31, 1996 was $42.9 million, comprised of long-term debt of $36 million and a short-term note payable of $6.9 million. However, by the end of 1997, total debt was $32 million, all long-term, for a total reduction of $10.9 million, or 25%. The Company expects long-term debt to decrease further in 1998 unless additional capital is needed for an acquisition and/or the price of crude oil remains low. G&A was $5.9 million in 1997, up 23% and 28%, from $4.8 million in 1996 and $4.6 million in 1995, respectively. However, on a BOE basis, G&A decreased to $1.30 from $1.35 in both 1996 and 1995. Two factors that increased G&A costs in 1997 were higher non-cash compensation related to the exercising of stock options and the writeoff of failed acquisition expenses. These two items accounted for $.7 million. The Company anticipates that its total G&A costs will not exceed its 1997 costs and will continue to decrease on a per BOE basis. 15

16 The Company's effective income tax rate in 1997 was 32%, down from 36% and 37% in 1996 and 1995, respectively. The lower rate in 1997 was due to additional federal and state tax credits generated from increased investment in qualified enhanced oil recovery projects. The Company expects that its effective rate would decrease significantly in a continuing low oil price environment. In December 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, "Earnings Per Share". As required by this new standard, the Company reports two earnings per share amounts, basic net income per share and diluted net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator). The computation of diluted net income per share is similar to the computation of basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effect of the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all convertible securities had been converted to common shares during the period. Also, during 1997 the Company adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) 96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities" and SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." The adoption of these two pronouncements had no material impact on the financial statements of the Company. During 1996, the Company implemented the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." This statement sets forth alternative standards for recognition of the cost of stock-based compensation and requires that a Company's financial statements include certain disclosures about stock-based employee compensation arrangements regardless of the method used to account for them. As allowed in this statement, the Company continues to apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations in recording compensation related to its plans. The supplemental disclosure requirements and further information related to the Company's stock option plans are presented in Note 9 to the Company's financial statements. Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Working capital as of December 31, 1997 was $11.5 million, up from $7.9 million at December 31, 1996, but down from $36.5 million at December 31, 1995. Cash flow from operations in 1997 increased to a record $31.4 million, up 8% and 84% from $29.2 million and $17.1 million in 1996 and 1995, respectively. Cash flow increased in 1997 from 1996 due primarily to higher production, offset partially by lower oil prices. Working capital increased in 1997 primarily because internally generated cash flow was more than sufficient to pay $18.6 million in capital expenditures, $8.8 million in dividends and retire $10.9 million in debt, $6.9 million of which was short-term notes payable. The Company drilled and completed 89 new wells in 1997, reworked an additional 70 wells and made several improvements and additions to surface facilities on the Company's core properties. On December 1, 1996, the Company established a $150 million unsecured three-year revolving credit facility with NationsBank of Texas. As of December 31, 1997, the borrowing base was $40 million, but was reduced to $35 million on January 23, 1998. The Company is carrying $32 million in long-term debt under this credit facility as of February 20, 1998. The total proved reserves at December 31, 1997 were 101 million BOE, down from 102.1 million BOE at December 31, 1996 and up from 78.1 million BOE at December 31, 1995. After production of 4.6 million BOE, the Company's proved reserves increased 3.5 million BOE, or 76%, of 1997 production. The increase in 1996 was primarily related to the acquisition of Tannehill and Formax in the fourth quarter of 1996. The Company's present value of estimated future net cash flows before income taxes, discounted at 10%, was $376 million at December 31, 1997, down 41% from $635 million at December 31, 1996, but up 22% from $308 million at December 31, 1995. These values were determined based on year end oil prices of $12.19, $18.37 and $13.39 per BOE for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. 16

17 Future Developments In December 1997, worldwide crude oil prices began to decline sharply and, as of March 9, 1998, the current average posting for the Company's 13 degree API gravity crude oil is $7.13 per barrel. In response, the Company will defer a minimum of 25% of its original 1998 $13.4 million capital program until at least the latter part of 1998 or until crude prices recover. In addition, certain operating costs have been reduced, such as steam, contractor services and overhead in response to the current pricing situation. Also, in mid-March 1998 the Company is instituting a 10% across-the-board salary cut with certain members of Management taking a larger percentage reduction. Deregulation of the electricity generation market in California may have a positive or negative impact on the Company's future steam costs as electricity prices somewhat de-couple from natural gas prices. Currently, the Company's electricity price received for sales from the two cogeneration plants owned by the Company correlates directly with natural gas prices. Therefore, our net steam costs are fairly consistent between quarters and years. In the future, electricity prices will be determined by not only the cost of natural gas, but also the cost of coal, hydroelectric, nuclear and other sources of fuel. In addition, power consumption demand may make electricity prices more volatile than in the past. The Company has performed a review of its computer systems and software to determine what steps must be taken to ensure the Company can handle transactions in the year 2000 and beyond. To handle this "Year 2000" issue, the Company will be replacing all of its accounting software in 1998 and expects this project to be completed in a timely manner for a total cost of approximately $.6 million. The Company is assessing all other Company systems to verify that they are "Year 2000" compliant. In 1998, the Company will adopt SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income." Management does not believe that adoption of this standard will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company. Impact of Inflation The impact of inflation on the Company has not been significant in recent years because of the relatively low rates of inflation experienced in the United States. Forward Looking Statements "Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Although the Company believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its goals will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements herein include, but are not limited to, the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices for oil and gas, environmental risks, drilling and operating risks, uncertainties about the estimates of reserves and government regulation. 17

18 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Page Report of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., Independent Accountants . . . . . . 19 Balance Sheets at December 31, 1997 and 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Notes to the Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Supplemental Information About Oil & Gas Producing Activities . . . . . 35 Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements and related notes. 18

19 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors Berry Petroleum Company We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Berry Petroleum Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Berry Petroleum Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. February 20, 1998 Los Angeles, California 19

20 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Balance Sheets December 31, 1997 and 1996 (In Thousands, Except Share Information) 1997 1996 ASSETS ------- ------- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 7,756 $ 9,970 Cash - restricted - 2,570 Short-term investments available for sale 718 704 Accounts receivable 8,990 11,701 Prepaid expenses and other 1,979 1,307 ------- ------- Total current assets 19,443 26,252 Oil and gas properties (successful efforts basis), buildings and equipment, net 157,441 149,510 Other assets 840 641 ------- ------- $ 177,724 $ 176,403 ======= ======= LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 4,432 $ 5,154 Notes payable - 6,900 Accrued liabilities 2,459 5,300 Federal and state income taxes payable 1,053 1,048 ------- ------- Total current liabilities 7,944 18,402 Long-term debt 32,000 36,000 Deferred income taxes 25,909 20,992 Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding - - Capital stock, $.01 par value: Class A Common Stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 21,094,494 shares issued and outstanding (21,046,885 in 1996) 211 210 Class B Stock, 1,500,000 shares authorized; 898,892 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $899) 9 9 Capital in excess of par value 53,422 53,029 Retained earnings 58,229 47,761 ------- ------- Total shareholders' equity 111,871 101,009 ------- ------- $ 177,724 $ 176,403 ======= ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20

21 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Statements of Operations Years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) 1997 1996 1995 ------- ------- ------- Revenues: Sales of oil and gas $ 67,172 $ 55,264 $ 45,773 Interest and dividend income 643 2,081 2,040 Gain on sale of assets 1,093 - 3,073 Other income (expense), net 87 (72) 304 ------- ------- ------- 68,995 57,273 51,190 ------- ------- ------- Expenses: Operating costs 22,407 17,587 18,264 Depreciation, depletion & amortization 10,138 7,323 6,847 Interest expense 2,302 178 - Exploratory dry hole costs - 71 2,012 General and administrative 5,907 4,820 4,578 ------- ------- ------- 40,754 29,979 31,701 ------- ------- ------- Income before income taxes 28,241 27,294 19,489 Provision for income taxes 8,981 9,748 7,286 ------- ------- ------- Net income $ 19,260 $ 17,546 $ 12,203 ======= ======= ======= Basic net income per share $ .88 $ .80 $ .56 ======= ======= ======= Diluted net income per share $ .87 $ .80 $ .56 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding (used to calculate basic net income per share) 21,976 21,939 21,932 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options 173 25 - Warrants 16 - - ------- ------- ------- Weighted average number of shares of capital stock used to calculate diluted net income per share 22,165 21,964 21,932 ======= ======= ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21

22 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Statements of Shareholders' Equity Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) Capital in Capital Stock Excess of Retained Shareholders' Class A Class B Par Value Earnings Equity ------- ------- ---------- -------- ------------ Balances at January 1, 1995 $ 210 $ 9 $ 52,852 $ 35,561 $ 88,632 Stock options expired - - (2) - (2) Cash dividends declared- $.40 per share - - - (8,773) (8,773) Net income - - - 12,203 12,203 ----- ----- ------- ------- ------- Balances at December 31, 1995 210 9 52,850 38,991 92,060 Stock retired - - (1) - (1) Stock options exercised - - 180 - 180 Cash dividends declared- $.40 per share - - - (8,776) (8,776) Net income - - - 17,546 17,546 ----- ----- ------- ------- ------- Balances at December 31, 1996 210 9 53,029 47,761 101,009 Stock options exercised 1 - 393 - 394 Cash dividends declared- $.40 per share - - - (8,792) (8,792) Net income - - - 19,260 19,260 ----- ----- ------- ------- ------- Balances at December 31, 1997 $ 211 $ 9 $ 53,422 $ 58,229 $ 111,871 ===== ===== ======= ======= ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22

23 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Statements of Cash Flows Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (In Thousands) 1997 1996 1995 Cash flows from operating activities: ------- ------- ------- Net income $ 19,260 $ 17,546 $ 12,203 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 10,138 7,323 6,847 Gain on sale of assets (1,093) - (3,073) Exploratory dry hole costs - 71 2,012 Increase (decrease) in deferred income tax liability 4,917 4,024 (1,985) Other, net (302) (329) (72) ------- ------- ------- Net working capital provided by operating activities 32,920 28,635 15,932 Decrease (increase) in current assets other than cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments 2,039 (2,262) 3,113 Increase (decrease) in current liabilities other than notes payable (3,558) 2,809 (1,975) ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by operating activities 31,401 29,182 17,070 ------- ------- ------- Cash flows from investing activities: Capital expenditures, excluding property acquisitions (18,597) (15,616) (14,569) Property acquisitions - (69,330) (503) Proceeds from sale of assets 1,892 352 6,242 Purchase of short-term investments (14) (710) (3,078) Maturities of short-term investments - 15,700 15,000 Restricted cash deposit 2,570 (2,570) - Other, net (50) (100) (96) ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (14,199) (72,274) 2,996 ------- ------- ------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 3,000 36,000 - Proceeds from issuance of short-term notes payable - 6,900 - Payment of long-term debt (7,000) - - Payment of short-term notes payable (6,900) - - Dividends paid (8,792) (8,776) (8,773) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 276 179 - ------- ------- ------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (19,416) 34,303 (8,773) ------- ------- ------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,214) (8,789) 11,293 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 9,970 18,759 7,466 ------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 7,756 $ 9,970 $ 18,759 ======= ======= ======= Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Interest paid $ 2,319 $ - $ 12 ======= ======= ======= Income taxes paid $ 4,280 $ 4,709 $ 5,554 ======= ======= ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 23

24 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 1. General The Company is an independent energy company engaged in the production, development, acquisition, exploitation, exploration and marketing of crude oil and natural gas. Substantially all of the Company's oil and gas reserves are located in California. Approximately 99% of the Company's production is crude oil, which is principally sold to other oil companies for processing in refineries located in California. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 2. Summary of significant accounting policies Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments All short-term investments are classified as available for sale. Short-term investments consist principally of United States treasury notes and corporate notes with remaining maturities of more than three months at date of acquisition. Such investments are stated at cost, which approximates market. The Company utilizes specific identification in computing realized gains and losses on investments sold. Oil and gas properties, buildings and equipment The Company accounts for its oil and gas exploration and development costs using the successful efforts method. Under this method, costs to acquire and develop proved reserves and to drill and complete exploratory wells that find proved reserves are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the reserves using the units- of-production method. Exploratory dry hole costs and other exploratory costs, including geological and geophysical costs, are charged to expense when incurred. The costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are also expensed when incurred. Depletion of oil and gas producing properties is computed using the units-of-production method. Depreciation of lease and well equipment is computed using the units-of-production method or on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 20 years. The estimated costs, net of salvage value, of plugging and abandoning oil and gas wells and related facilities are accrued using the units-of-production method and are taken into account in determining DD&A expense. Buildings and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 30 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Assets are grouped at the field level and if it is determined that the book value of long- lived assets cannot be recovered by estimated future undiscounted cash flows, they will be written down to fair value. When assets are sold, the applicable costs and accumulated depreciation and depletion are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in income. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. 24

25 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 2. Summary of significant accounting policies (cont'd) Hedging The Company periodically enters into bracketed zero cost collar hedge contracts on a portion of its crude oil production with a California refiner to protect the Company's revenues from potential price declines. Any revenues received or costs incurred related to this hedging activity is reflected in sales of oil and gas of the Company. Steam Costs The costs of producing steam are recorded as an operating expense of the Company. Proceeds received from the sale of electricity produced by its cogeneration plants are reported as a reduction to operating costs in the Company's financial statements. Stock-Based Compensation During 1996, the Company implemented the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This statement sets forth alternative standards for recognition of the cost of stock-based compensation and requires that a Company's financial statements include certain disclosures about stock-based employee compensation arrangements regardless of the method used to account for them. As allowed in this statement, the Company continues to apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations in recording compensation related to its plans. The supplemental disclosure requirements and further information related to the Company's stock option plans are presented in Note 9 to the Company's financial statements. Income Taxes Income taxes are provided based on the liability method of accounting pursuant to SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The provision for income taxes is based on pre-tax financial accounting income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future expected tax consequences of temporary differences between income tax and financial reporting, and principally relate to differences in the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which differences are expected to reverse. If it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recognized. Earnings Per Share In December 1997, the Company adopted SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." As required by this new standard, the Company reports two earnings per share amounts, basic net income and diluted net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator). The computation of diluted net income per share is similar to the computation of basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effect of the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all convertible securities had been converted to common shares during the period. Comparative earnings per share data for prior periods presented has been restated to conform to the new standard. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1996 and 1995 financial statements to conform with the 1997 presentation. 25

26 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 3. Fair value of financial instruments Financial instruments consist of cash and short-term investments, whose carrying amounts are not materially different from their fair values because of the short maturity of those instruments. Cash equivalents consist principally of commercial paper investments. Cash equivalents of $6.2 million and $5.9 million at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, are stated at cost, which approximates market. The Company's short-term investments available for sale at December 31, 1997 and 1996 consist of one United States treasury note. All of the short-term investments at December 31, 1997 mature in less than two years. The carrying value of the Company's long-term debt, which was incurred in 1996, is assumed to approximate its fair value since it is carried at current interest rates. For the three years ended December 31, 1997, realized and unrealized gains and losses were insignificant to the financial statements. United States treasury notes with an aggregate market value of $.6 million are pledged as collateral to the California State Lands Commission as a performance bond on the Company's Montalvo properties. To protect the Company's revenues from potential price declines, the Company entered into a bracketed zero cost collar hedge contract with a California refiner covering 3,000 barrels/day of its crude oil production. The posted price of the Company's 13 degree API gravity crude oil was used as the basis for the hedge. The current contract expires on August 31, 1998. 4. Concentration of Credit Risks The Company sells oil, gas and natural gas liquids to pipelines, refineries and major oil companies. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition. For the three years ended December 31, 1997, the Company has experienced no credit losses on the sale of oil, gas and natural gas liquids. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high quality financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution. For the three years ended December 31, 1997, the Company has not incurred losses related to these investments. The following summarizes the accounts receivable balances at December 31, 1997 and sales activity with significant customers for each of the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 (in thousands): Sales Accounts Receivable For the Year Ended December 31, ----------------------------------- ---------------------------- Customer December 31, 1997 December 31, 1996 1997 1996 1995 -------- ----------------- ----------------- ------ ------ ------ A $ 1,812 $ 2,246 $ 23,804 $ 23,067 $ 12,641 B 1,681 1,845 19,482 14,478 12,918 C 15 1,282 7,119 10,982 9,214 D 1,587 - 12,875 - - E - - - - 5,265 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ $ 5,095 $ 5,373 $ 63,280 $ 48,527 $ 40,038 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== 26

27 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 5. Oil and gas properties, buildings and equipment Oil and gas properties, buildings and equipment consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands): 1997 1996 Oil and gas: ------ ------ Proved properties: Producing properties, including intangible drilling costs $ 128,453 $ 126,361 Lease and well equipment 92,461 88,539 Unproved properties - 169 ------- ------- 220,914 215,069 Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization 65,828 67,995 ------- ------- 155,086 147,074 ------- ------- Commercial and other: Land 151 151 Buildings and improvements 4,034 3,938 Machinery and equipment 3,653 3,707 ------- ------- 7,838 7,796 Less accumulated depreciation 5,483 5,360 ------- ------- 2,355 2,436 ------- ------- $ 157,441 $ 149,510 ======= ======= The following sets forth costs incurred for oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities, whether capitalized or expensed (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Acquisition of properties(1) $ - $ 69,330 $ 503 Exploration - 40 1,420 Development(2) 18,172 15,689 14,034 ------- ------- ------- $ 18,172 $ 85,059 $ 15,957 ======= ======= ======= (1) Excludes cogeneration facility costs and includes certain closing and consultant costs related to the acquisitions. (2) Includes cogeneration facilities. The Company completed two significant acquisitions (Tannehill and Formax) in 1996 for a combined purchase price of approximately $75 million, including the purchase of an 18 megawatt cogeneration facility. The properties, which produced approximately 3,900 barrels per day of 13 degree API gravity crude oil at the end of 1997, are in the Company's core South Midway-Sunset producing area. These acquisitions had proved reserves of approximately 27 million barrels upon acquisition, and were financed by utilizing working capital and long-term borrowings. 27

28 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 5. Oil and gas properties, buildings and equipment (cont'd) Results of operations from oil and gas producing and exploration activities The results of operations from oil and gas producing and exploration activities (excluding corporate overhead and interest costs) for the three years ended December 31 are as follows (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Sales to unaffiliated parties $ 67,172 $ 55,264 $ 45,773 Production costs (22,407) (17,587) (18,264) Exploration expenses - (71) (2,012) Depreciation, depletion and amortization (9,731) (6,868) (6,354) ------- ------- ------- 35,034 30,738 19,143 Income tax expenses (10,870) (10,230) (6,084) ------- ------- ------- Results of operations from producing and exploration activities $ 24,164 $ 20,508 $ 13,059 ======= ======= ======= 6. Debt obligations 1997 1996 Long-term debt for the years ended December 31 ------ ------ (in thousands): Revolving bank facility $ 32,000 $ 36,000 ======= ======= At December 31, 1997, Berry had a $150 million unsecured three- year revolving credit facility with NationsBank of Texas. The maximum amount available is subject to an annual redetermination of the borrowing base in accordance with the lender's customary procedures and practices. Both parties have bilateral rights to one additional redetermination each year. As of December 31, 1997, the borrowing base was $40 million and the principal amount outstanding was $32 million. As of January 23, 1998, the borrowing base was reduced to $35 million. The revolving period is scheduled to terminate on November 30, 1999, at which time any unpaid balance can be converted to a four-year term loan, amortized quarterly. Interest on amounts borrowed is charged at NationsBank base rate or at London Interbank Offered Rates (LIBOR) plus 60 to 100 basis points, depending on the ratio of outstanding credit to the borrowing base. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings at December 31, 1997 was 6.48%. The Company pays a commitment fee of 20 to 35 basis points on the available unused portion of the commitment. The credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants as defined in the agreement. In conjunction with the purchase of Tannehill in November 1996, the Company incurred $6.9 million in short-term notes, which were due and paid on January 6, 1997. 28

29 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 7. Shareholders' equity Shares of Class A Common Stock (Common Stock) and Class B Stock, referred to collectively as the "Capital Stock", are each entitled to one vote and 95% of one vote, respectively. Each share of Class B Stock is entitled to a $1.00 per share preference in the event of liquidation or dissolution. Further, each share of Class B Stock is convertible into one share of Common Stock at the option of the holder. In December 1989, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Agreement and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of Capital Stock. Each Right, when exercisable, entitles the holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of a Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, or in certain cases other securities, for $38.00. The exercise price and number of shares issuable are subject to adjustment to prevent dilution. The Rights would become exercisable, unless earlier redeemed by the Company, 10 days following a public announcement that a person or group has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or, 10 business days following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for such outstanding shares which would result in such person or group acquiring 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, either event occurring without the prior consent of the Company. The Rights will expire in December 1999 or may be redeemed by the Company at $.01 per Right prior to that date unless they have theretofore become exercisable. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights, and until they become exercisable, have no diluting effect on the earnings of the Company. A total of 250,000 shares of the Company's Preferred Stock has been designated Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and reserved for issuance upon exercise of the Rights. In conjunction with the acquisition of Tannehill, the Company issued a Warrant Certificate to the beneficial owners of Tannehill Oil Company. This Warrant authorizes the purchase of 100,000 shares of Berry Petroleum Company Class A Common Stock until November 8, 2003 at $14.06 per share. All the warrants are currently outstanding and the underlying shares will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company issued 47,621, 13,932, and -0- shares in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, through its stock option plans. At December 31, 1997, dividends declared on 4,041,400 shares of certain Common Stock are restricted, whereby 37.5% of the dividends declared on these shares are paid by the Company to the surviving member of a group of individuals, the B Group, as long as this remaining member shall live. 29

30 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 8. Income taxes The Provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 ----- ----- ----- Current: Federal $ 3,502 $ 3,519 $ 5,089 State 995 1,027 2,042 ------ ------ ------ 4,497 4,546 7,131 ------ ------ ------ Deferred: Federal 3,940 4,322 828 State 544 880 (673) ------ ------ ------ 4,484 5,202 155 ------ ------ ------ Total $ 8,981 $ 9,748 $ 7,286 ====== ====== ====== The current deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset and presented as a single amount in the financial statements. Similarly, the noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented in the same manner. The following table summarizes the components of the total deferred tax assets and liabilities before such financial statement offsets. The components of the net deferred tax liability consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands): 1997 1996 Deferred tax asset ------ ------ Federal benefit of state taxes $ 1,900 $ 1,710 Credit/deduction carryforwards 1,440 - Other, net 415 448 ------- ------ 3,755 2,158 ------- ------- Deferred tax liability Depreciation and depletion (24,069) (18,529) State taxes, net of federal benefit (4,546) (4,002) Other, net (619) (622) ------- ------- (29,234) (23,153) ------- ------- Net deferred tax liability $ (25,479) $ (20,995) ======= ======= 30

31 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 8. Income taxes (cont'd) Reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate follows: 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Tax computed at statutory federal rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% Asset acquisition/sale differences - - 6.7 State income taxes, net of federal benefit 3.5 4.5 4.6 Tax credits (7.6) (4.5) (5.7) Other .9 .7 (3.2) ------ ------ ------ Effective tax rate 31.8% 35.7% 37.4% ====== ====== ====== The Company has $.3 million of loss carryforwards which may be utilized in future years to reduce the Company's federal income taxes. These loss carryforwards expire in the year 2000. The Company also has approximately $2.2 million of federal and $1.0 million of state enhanced oil recovery (EOR) tax credit carryforwards available to reduce future income taxes. The EOR credits will expire in the year 2012, if not previously utilized. The Company went to trial in April 1993 before the U.S. Tax Court on certain federal tax issues relating to the years 1987 through 1989. The Court's decision was rendered in May 1995, resulting in an approximate $.5 million charge. The Company is pursuing an appeal of the Court's decision with respect to certain issues to the U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) and a hearing was held in March 1997 with a decision expected in the near future. 31

32 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 9. Stock option and stock appreciation rights plans The Company has a 1987 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the NSO Plan) and a 1987 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the SAR Plan). The NSO Plan provided for the granting of options (Options) to purchase up to an aggregate of 700,000 shares of Common Stock. The SAR Plan originally authorized a maximum of 700,000 shares of Common Stock subject to stock appreciation rights (SARs). Holders of SARs have the right upon exercise to receive a payment, payable at the discretion of the Compensation Committee in cash or in shares of Common Stock, equal to the amount by which the market price exceeds the Base Price (as defined) with respect to the shares subject to such SARs on the date of exercise. In December 1994, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution to terminate the 1987 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan without utilizing the 307,860 SARs which were still available for issuance. The 1,120 outstanding SARs at year end were exercised in early 1998. Total compensation expense recognized for the SAR Plan in 1997, 1996 and 1995 was $-0-, $.1 million and $-0-, respectively. On December 2, 1994, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Berry Petroleum Company 1994 Stock Option Plan (the 1994 Plan). The 1994 Plan was approved by the shareholders in May 1995 and provides for the granting of stock options to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. All Options, with the exception of the formula grants to non-employee Directors, will be granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The term of each Option may not exceed ten years from the date the Option is granted. On December 5, 1997, June 2, 1997 and December 6, 1996, 200,000, 40,000 and 480,000 Options, respectively, were issued to certain key employees at an exercise price of $19.375, $15.50 and $14.00 per share, respectively, which was the closing market price of the Company's Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on those dates. The Options vest 25% per year for four years. The 1994 Plan also allows for Option grants to the Board of Directors under a formula plan whereby all non-employee Directors are eligible to receive 3,000 Options annually on December 2 at the fair value on the date of grant. The Options granted to the non-employee Directors vest immediately. Through the 1994 Plan, 30,000, 33,000 and 33,000 Options, respectively, were issued on December 2, 1997, 1996 and 1995, (3,000 Options to each of the non-employee Directors each year) at an exercise price of $18.9375, $13.75 and $10.625 per share, respectively. The Company applies APB No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, since the stock options related to the 1987 Plan were issued at prices below the existing current market prices and they were fully vested previously, compensation related to this plan was recorded in prior years. The Options issued per the 1994 Plan were issued at market price. Compensation recognized related to this plan was $.5 million in 1997, $.1 million in 1996 and $-0- in 1995. Under SFAS No. 123, compensation cost would be recognized for the fair value of the employee's option rights. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Dividend - $/year $ .40 $ .40 $ .40 Expected option life-years 4 4 4 Volatility 26.03% 24.97% 24.97% Risk-free interest rate 5.48% 6.10% 6.10% 32

33 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 9. Stock option and stock appreciation rights plans (cont'd) Had compensation cost for the 1994 Plan been based upon the fair value at the grant dates for awards under this plan consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro-forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data): 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Net income as reported $ 19,260 $ 17,546 $ 12,203 Pro forma $ 19,185 $ 17,387 $ 12,066 Net income per share as reported $ .88 $ .80 $ .56 Pro forma $ .87 $ .79 $ .55 The following is a summary of stock-based compensation activity for the years 1997, 1996 and 1995. 1997 1996 1995 --------------- --------------- -------------- Options SARs Options SARs Options SARs Balance outstanding, ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ January 1 861,229 9,200 431,141 39,740 398,141 39,740 Granted 270,000 - 513,000 - 33,000 - Exercised (196,800) (8,080) (76,912 (30,540) - - Canceled/expired (10,000) - (6,000) - - - Balance outstanding, ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- December 31 924,429 1,120 861,229 9,200 431,141 39,740 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Balance exercisable at December 31 256,929 1,120 231,229 9,200 206,141 39,740 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Available for future grant 60,800 - 320,800 - 827,800 - ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Exercise price-range $ 9.80 $ 9.80 $ 9.80 $ 9.80 $ 9.80 $ 9.80 to 19.375 to 10.00 to 14.00 to 10.00 to 10.75 to 10.00 Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) 9 1 9 2 8 3 Weighted average fair value per option granted during the year $ 4.56 $ 3.22 $ 2.23 Weighted average option exercise price information for the years 1997, 1996 and 1995 as follows: 1997 1996 1995 ------ ------ ------ Outstanding at January 1 $ 12.61 $ 10.52 $ 10.51 Granted during the year $ 18.75 $ 13.98 $ 10.63 Exercised during the year $ 11.03 $ 12.82 $ - Expired during the year $ 14.00 $ 10.69 $ - Outstanding at December 31 $ 14.71 $ 12.61 $ 10.52 Exercisable at December 31 $ 13.09 $ 11.02 $ 10.45 33

34 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Notes to the Financial Statements 10. Retirement Plan The Company sponsors a defined contribution retirement or thrift plan (401(k) Plan) to assist all employees in providing for retirement or other future financial needs. Employee contributions (up to 6% of their earnings) are matched by the Company dollar for dollar. Effective November 1, 1992, the 401(k) Plan was modified to provide for increased Company matching of employee contributions whereby the monthly Company matching contributions will range from 6% to 9% of eligible participating employee earnings, if certain financial results are achieved. Due to improved financial results, the monthly matching contributions ranged from 6% to 9% during 1997 and 1996. The Company's contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $.3 million in 1997 and 1996 and $.2 million in 1995. 11. Oil Spill In December 1993, the Company experienced a crude oil spill at its Montalvo field in Ventura County, California. The Company reached final settlement with the federal and state governments in February 1997. The Company's prior accruals were adequate in settling all claims. 12. Quarterly financial data (unaudited) The following is a tabulation of unaudited quarterly operating results for 1997 and 1996 (in thousands, except for per share data). Basic Diluted 1997 Operating Gross Net Net Income Net Income - ----- Revenues Profit Income Per Share Per Share ---------- -------- -------- ----------- ----------- First Quarter $ 17,025 $ 8,952 $ 4,816 $ .22 $ .22 Second Quarter 15,988 8,787 4,652 .21 .21 Third Quarter 16,775 8,697 5,136 .23 .23 Fourth Quarter 17,327 8,533 4,656 .22 .21 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 67,115 $ 34,969 $ 19,260 $ .88 $ .87 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= 1996 - ----- First Quarter $ 12,145 $ 6,825 $ 3,861 $ .18 $ .18 Second Quarter 13,219 7,820 4,398 .20 .20 Third Quarter 13,433 7,063 4,012 .18 .18 Fourth Quarter 16,394 8,958 5,275 .24 .24 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 55,191 $ 30,666 $ 17,546 $ .80 $ .80 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= 34

35 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Supplemental Information About Oil & Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited) The following estimates of proved oil and gas reserves, both developed and undeveloped, represent interests owned by the Company located solely within the United States. Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells for which relatively major expenditures are required for completion. Disclosures of oil and gas reserves which follow are based on estimates prepared by independent engineering consultants for the three years ended December 31, 1997. Such estimates are subject to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. These estimates do not include probable or possible reserves. The information provided does not represent Management's estimate of the Company's expected future cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Changes in estimated reserve quantities The net interest in estimated quantities of proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil and natural gas at December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and changes in such quantities during each of the years then ended were as follows (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 --------------- --------------- --------------- Oil Gas Oil Gas Oil Gas Mbbls Mmcf Mbbls Mmcf Mbbls Mmcf Proved developed and ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ undeveloped reserves: Beginning of year 101,336 4,682 77,071 5,983 75,996 6,530 Revision of previous estimates 3,647 (869) 739 (810) 5,266 803 Production (4,503) (282) (3,491) (491) (3,277) (611) Sale of reserves in place (26) - - - (1,698) (739) Purchase of reserves in place - - 27,017 - 784 - ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ End of year 100,454 3,531 101,336 4,682 77,071 5,983 ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== Proved developed reserves: Beginning of year 76,358 2,608 62,856 3,380 62,718 4,727 ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== End of year 86,858 1,457 76,358 2,608 62,856 3,380 ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== 35

36 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Supplemental Information About Oil & Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)(Cont'd) The standardized measure has been prepared assuming year-end sales prices adjusted for fixed and determinable contractual price changes, current costs and statutory tax rates (adjusted for tax credits and other items), and a ten percent annual discount rate. No deduction has been made for depletion, depreciation or any indirect costs such as general corporate overhead or interest expense. Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from estimated production of proved oil and gas reserves (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 ----------- ----------- ----------- Future cash inflows $ 1,232,749 $ 1,875,373 $ 1,039,150 Future production and development costs (421,305) (429,879) (311,955) Future income tax expenses (246,668) (495,412) (245,416) --------- --------- --------- Future net cash flows 564,776 950,082 481,779 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows (297,182) (529,523) (273,478) --------- --------- --------- Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 267,594 $ 420,559 $ 208,301 ========= ========= ========= Pre-tax standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $ 376,459 $ 634,579 $ 308,370 ========= ========= ========= Average sales prices at December 31: Oil ($/Bbl) $ 12.19 $ 18.37 $ 13.39 Gas ($/Mcf) $ 2.33 $ 3.02 $ 1.45 Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves (in thousands): 1997 1996 1995 -------- -------- -------- Standardized measure - beginning of year $ 420,559 $ 208,301 $ 180,953 Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs (44,765) (37,677) (27,509) Revisions to estimates of proved reserves: Net changes in sales prices and production costs (259,026) 170,529 41,726 Revisions of previous quantity estimates 14,014 4,020 23,584 Change in estimated future development costs (1,775) (19,294) (14,234) Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery less related costs - - - Purchases of reserves in place - 171,456 2,316 Sale of reserves in place (244) - (8,645) Development costs incurred during the period 18,597 9,305 14,034 Accretion of discount 63,458 30,837 2,639 Income taxes 109,780 (101,936) (13,126) Other (53,004) (14,982) 6,563 ------- ------- ------- Net increase (decrease) (152,965) 212,258 27,348 ------- ------- ------- Standardized measure - end of year $ 267,594 $ 420,559 $ 208,301 ======= ======= ======= 36

37 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant The information called for by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from information under the caption "Election of Directors" in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year. The information on Executive Officers is contained in Part I of this Form 10-K. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from information under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The information called for by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from information under the caption "Voting Securities" and "Principal Shareholders and Ownership by Management" in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year. Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related Securities and Exchange Commission rules require that directors and executive officers report to the Securities and Exchange Commission changes in their beneficial ownership of Berry stock, and that any late filings be disclosed. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or written representations that no Form 5 was required, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with, except that one report for some shares gifted was filed late by Mr. William F. Berry. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from information under the caption "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year. PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K A. Financial Statements and Schedules See Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in Item 8. B. Reports on Form 8-K None. 37

38 C. Exhibits Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Page - ----------- -------------------------- ------ 3.1* Registrant's Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 7, 1989, File No. 33-29165) 3.2* Registrant's Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 on June 7, 1989, File No. 33-29165) 3.3* Registrant's Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989, File No. 0-11708) 4.1* Rights Agreement between Registrant and Bank of America dated as of December 8, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 1 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 1989, File No. 0-11708) 10.1 Description of Cash Bonus Plan of Berry Petroleum Company 43 10.2 Salary Continuation Agreement dated as of December 5, 1997, by and between Registrant and Jerry V. Hoffman 44 10.3 Form of Salary Continuation Agreement dated as of December 5, 1997, by and between Registrant and Ralph J. Goehring and Michael R. Starzer 47 10.4* Form of Salary Continuation Agreements dated as of March 20, 1987, as amended August 28, 1987, by and between Registrant and selected employees of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 7, 1989, File No. 33-29165) 10.5* Instrument for Settlement of Claims and Mutual Release by and among Registrant, Victory Oil Company, the Crail Fund and Victory Holding Company effective October 31, 1986 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on May 22, 1987, File No. 33-13240) 10.6* 1994 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 1-9735) 10.7* Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 8, 1996, by and between the Registrant and Tannehill Oil Company, Inc., a California corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 in Registrant's Form 8-K filed on December 2, 1996, File No. 1-9735) 10.8* Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 8, 1996, by and between the Registrant and Tannehill Electric Company, Inc., a California corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.2 in Registrant's Form 8-K on December 2, 1996, File No. 1-9735) 10.9* Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 8, 1996, by and between the Registrant and Tannehill Oil Company, a California general partnership, and Boyce Resource Development Company, a California corporation; Albert G. Boyce, Jr., as Trustee of Trust "B" Under the Will of Albert G. Boyce, Sr., Deceased; William J. Boyce; Albert Gallatin Boyce V; Mary Katherine Boyce; John T. Hinkle; General Western, Inc., a New Mexico corporation; Delmar R. Archibald Family Trust, dated June 22, 1982; Lisle Q. Tannehill; John W. Tannehill; Gail Kay Tannehill, as Trustee of the Gail Kay Tannehill Family Trust, dated April 9, 1996; and Thomas H. Tannehill, all acting as partners of Tannehill Oil Company and individually, jointly and severally (filed as Exhibit 10.3 in Registrant's Form 8-K filed on December 2, 1996, File No. 1-9735) 38

39 Exhibits (cont'd) Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Page - ----------- --------------------------- ------ 10.10* Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1996, by and between the Registrant and NationsBank of Texas, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 in Registrant's Form 8-K filed on December 18, 1996, File No. 1-9735) 10.11* Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 11, 1996, by and between the Registrant and Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 in Registrant's Form 8-K filed on December 17, 1996, File No. 1-9735) 10.12* Standard Offer #2 Power Purchase Agreement dated May 1984 by and between Registrant's predecessor and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (filed as Exhibit 10.14 in Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 21, 1997, File No. 1-9735) 10.13* Standard Offer #1 Power Purchase Agreement dated January 16, 1997, by and between Registrant and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (filed as Exhibit 10.15 in Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 21, 1997, File No. 1-9735) 10.14* Warrant Certificate dated November 14, 1996, by and between Registrant and Tannehill Oil Company (filed as Exhibit 10.16 in Registrant's Form 10-K filed on March 21, 1997, File No. 1-9735) 23.1 Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 50 23.2 Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton 51 27. ** Financial Data Schedule 52 99.1 Undertaking for Form S-8 Registration Statements 53 99.2* Form of Indemnity Agreement of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 28.2 in Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 7, 1987, File No. 33-13240) 99.3* Form of "B" Group Trust (filed as Exhibit 28.3 to Amendment No. 1 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on May 22, 1987, File No. 33-13240) * Incorporated by reference ** Included in the Company's electronic filing on EDGAR 39

40 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized on March 10, 1998. BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY /s/ JERRY V. HOFFMAN /s/ RALPH J. GOEHRING /s/ DONALD A. DALE JERRY V. HOFFMAN RALPH J. GOEHRING DONALD A. DALE Chairman of the Board, Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal President and Chief Chief Financial Officer Accounting Officer) Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the dates so indicated. Name Office Date /s/ Jerry V. Hoffman Chairman of the Board , President March 10, 1998 Jerry V. Hoffman & Chief Executive Officer /s/ Benton Bejach Director March 10, 1998 Benton Bejach /s/ William F. Berry Director March 10, 1998 William F. Berry /s/ Gerry A. Biller Director March 10, 1998 Gerry A. Biller /s/ Ralph B. Busch, III Director March 10, 1998 Ralph B. Busch, III /s/ William E. Bush, Jr. Director March 10, 1998 William E. Bush, Jr. /s/ William B. Charles Director March 10, 1998 William B. Charles /s/ Richard F. Downs Director March 10, 1998 Richard F. Downs /s/ John A. Hagg Director March 10, 1998 John A. Hagg /s/ Thomas J. Jamieson Director March 10, 1998 Thomas J. Jamieson /s/ Roger G. Martin Director March 10, 1998 Roger G. Martin /s/ James A. Middleton Director March 10, 1998 James A. Middleton 40



                       DESCRIPTION OF CASH BONUS PLAN

     Berry Petroleum Company has a cash bonus plan ("Cash Bonus Plan") for 
its management and supervisory level employees.  Under the plan, a "bonus pool"
is calculated based upon a percentage, as set by the Board of Directors (which
is currently 3%), of the net earnings of the Company after certain adjustments
are made.  The Berry Petroleum Company Compensation Committee, which consists 
of directors Benton Bejach, William E. Bush, Jr., Thomas J. Jamieson and 
Roger G. Martin, recommends bonus awards, up to the maximum amount 
of the "bonus pool" to management and supervisory level employees on a merit 
basis.  The Compensation Committee meets in March of each year after the 
auditors have completed their review of the Company's financial statements 
for the preceding calendar year, and the necessary calculations are made to 
determine the amount available for distribution.  The Committee then makes
their recommendation to the Board of Directors which authorizes the payment
of cash bonuses from the Cash Bonus Plan.



















                                 EXHIBIT 10.1

                       SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

          THIS SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and 
entered into effective as of December 5, 1997, by and between BERRY 
PETROLEUM COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Berry"), and JERRY V. HOFFMAN 
("Employee"), with reference to the following facts:

          A.     Employee is currently serving as the President, Chief 
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Berry (the "Board
of Directors") and is a valuable employee of Berry whose continued employment
is beneficial to Berry.

          B.     Effective March 20, 1987, Employee and Berry entered into that
certain Salary Continuation Agreement as recommended by the Compensation 
Committee of the Board of Directors and adopted by the Board of Directors.

          C.     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has 
reconsidered the terms and conditions of Employee's salary continuation 
provision in the event of a Change of Control (as defined below) while Employee 
is employed by Berry.  The Board of Directors has acted upon the Compensation 
Committee's recommendations and on December 5, 1997, approved the salary 
continuation provision described in this Agreement which is intended to 
replace and supersede in its entirety that certain Salary Continuation 
Agreement, dated March 20, 1987, between the parties hereto.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and 
obligations contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the 
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree 
as follows:

          1.     Salary Continuation Provision.  

                      (a)     In the event of a Change of Control of Berry, 
Berry agrees to pay to Employee on the effective date of such Change of 
Control a single payment in an amount equal to his Salary (as defined herein)
multiplied by 2.

                      (b)     For purposes of this Agreement, a "Change of 
Control" of Berry shall mean and shall be deemed to have occurred if and when 
any one of the following four events occurs: (a) within the meaning of Section
13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any person or group becomes a 
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of Berry representing 
20% or more of the combined voting power of Berry's then outstanding 
securities, without the prior approval of Berry; (b) individuals who were 
members of the Board of Directors immediately prior to a meeting of the 
stockholders of Berry involving a contest for the election of Directors shall
not constitute a majority of the Board of Directors following such election; 
(c) the stockholders of Berry approve an agreement to merge or consolidate, 
or otherwise reorganize, with or into one or more entities which are not 
subsidiaries, as a result of which less than 50% of the outstanding 
securities of the surviving or resulting entity are, or are to be, owned by 
former stockholders of Berry (excluding from the term "former stockholders" 
a stockholder who is, or as a result of the transaction in question, becomes 
an "affiliate," as that term is used in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
and the Rules promulgated thereunder, of any party to such merger, 
consolidation or reorganization); or (d) the stockholders of Berry approve 
the sale of substantially all of Berry's business and/or assets (in one 
transaction or a series of related transactions) to a person or entity 
which is not a subsidiary.

                      (c)     For purposes of this Agreement, Employee's 
"Salary" shall mean (i) Employee's regular annual salary in effect as of the 
effective date of a Change of Control (as reportable on Employee's 
IRS Form W-2, including the amount of any voluntary deferrals of salary, and 
excluding any gain from exercise of stock options or any other similar 
non-recurring payments), plus (ii) an amount equal to the average of the 
cash bonuses received by Employee for the two (2) fiscal years immediately 
prior to the Change of Control.

          2.     Employment Status.  No assurance is given to Employee that 
after a Change of Control he will in fact be retained by Berry, or its 
successor, or that he will have the same job classification.  Employee 
understands and acknowledges that Berry, or its successor, shall not be 
obligated in any way to Employee under the provisions of this Agreement if 
Employee resigns or is terminated by Berry, whether with or without cause, 
prior to the effective date of a Change of Control so long as employee's 
termination immediately prior to a change of control was not motivated by a 
bad faith intent to avoid the obligation arising under this agreement.

          3.     No Contract of Employment.  Nothing in this Agreement shall 
be construed or interpreted as creating any contract or agreement of 
employment or any right to continued employment with Berry.  This Agreement 
is not intended to confer upon Employee any right to notice of termination 
beyond that customarily given by Berry to its employees generally, or as may 
be set forth in any written employment agreement.  Any successor-in-interest 
of Berry shall be free to establish its own policies or procedures for notice
and termination of employment.

          4.     General Provisions.

                      (a)     Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein 
may be assigned by Employee.

                      (b)     This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall 
be enforceable against Berry, its successors-in-interest and assigns and the 
benefits hereunder shall accrue to Employee, his heirs, executors or 
administrators.

                     (c)     This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement 
between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and 
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, 
between them regarding the subject matter hereof.  This Agreement is intended 
to replace and supersede in its entirety that certain Salary Continuation 
Agreement dated March 20, 1987, between the parties hereto.

                     (d)     In the event of any claim, dispute or controversy
arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including an action for 
declaratory relief, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be
entitled to recover court costs and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses not 
limited to taxable costs, including, but not limited to, phone calls, 
photocopies, expert witness, travel, etc., and reasonable attorneys' fees to 
be fixed by the court.  Such recovery shall include court costs, out-of-pocket
expenses and attorneys' fees on appeal, if any.  The court shall determine who 
is the "prevailing party" whether or not the dispute or controversy proceeds 
to final judgment.  If either party is reasonably required to incur such 
out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees as a result of any claim arising 
out of or concerning this Agreement or any right or obligation derived 
hereunder, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover such 
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees whether or not an 
action is filed.

                      (e)     This Agreement shall be construed and governed by 
the laws, without regard to the laws as to choice or conflict of laws, of the 
State of California.  The parties hereto acknowledge that this Agreement was 
executed in Kern County, California.  By execution and delivery of this 
Agreement, the parties hereto agree and accept that any legal action or 
proceeding shall be brought in the federal or state courts for the State of 
California, County of Kern, and the parties expressly waive any objection to 
personal jurisdiction, venue or forum non conveniens.

                      (f)     This Agreement contains the entire agreement and 
understanding of the parties and may not be modified except by further written 
instrument.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement 
effective the date and year first above written.

                                                     BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY,
                                                     a Delaware corporation


                                            By: ___________________________
                                                                              
                                              Benton Bejach, Chairman of the
                                              Compensation Committee of the
                                              Board of Directors
                                               
                                                                      "Berry"



                                                                                
                                              ______________________________
                                                                                
                                              JERRY V. HOFFMAN
                                                                             
                                                                   "Employee"
 

 
 

                              EXHIBIT 10.2


                       SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

          THIS SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and 
entered into effective as of December 5, 1997, by and between BERRY 
PETROLEUM COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Berry"), and _______________
("Employee"), with reference to the following facts:

          A.     Employee is currently serving as the _____________________ 
of Berry and is a valuable employee of Berry whose continued employment
is beneficial to Berry.

          B.     Effective ___________, Employee and Berry entered into that
certain Salary Continuation Agreement as recommended by the Compensation 
Committee of the Board of Directors and adopted by the Board of Directors.

          C.     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has 
reconsidered the terms and conditions of Employee's salary continuation 
provision in the event of a Change of Control (as defined below) while Employee 
is employed by Berry.  The Board of Directors has acted upon the Compensation 
Committee's recommendations and on December 5, 1997, approved the salary 
continuation provision described in this Agreement which is intended to 
replace and supersede in its entirety that certain Salary Continuation 
Agreement, dated ________________, between the parties hereto.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and 
obligations contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the 
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree 
as follows:

          1.     Salary Continuation Provision.  

                      (a)     In the event of a Change of Control of Berry, 
Berry agrees to pay to Employee on the effective date of such Change of 
Control a single payment in an amount equal to his Salary (as defined herein)
multiplied by 1.

                      (b)     For purposes of this Agreement, a "Change of 
Control" of Berry shall mean and shall be deemed to have occurred if and when 
any one of the following four events occurs: (a) within the meaning of Section
13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any person or group becomes a 
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of Berry representing 
20% or more of the combined voting power of Berry's then outstanding 
securities, without the prior approval of Berry; (b) individuals who were 
members of the Board of Directors immediately prior to a meeting of the 
stockholders of Berry involving a contest for the election of Directors shall
not constitute a majority of the Board of Directors following such election; 
(c) the stockholders of Berry approve an agreement to merge or consolidate, 
or otherwise reorganize, with or into one or more entities which are not 
subsidiaries, as a result of which less than 50% of the outstanding 
securities of the surviving or resulting entity are, or are to be, owned by 
former stockholders of Berry (excluding from the term "former stockholders" 
a stockholder who is, or as a result of the transaction in question, becomes 
an "affiliate," as that term is used in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
and the Rules promulgated thereunder, of any party to such merger, 
consolidation or reorganization); or (d) the stockholders of Berry approve 
the sale of substantially all of Berry's business and/or assets (in one 
transaction or a series of related transactions) to a person or entity 
which is not a subsidiary.

                      (c)     For purposes of this Agreement, Employee's 
"Salary" shall mean (i) Employee's regular annual salary in effect as of the 
effective date of a Change of Control (as reportable on Employee's 
IRS Form W-2, including the amount of any voluntary deferrals of salary, and 
excluding any gain from exercise of stock options or any other similar 
non-recurring payments), plus (ii) an amount equal to the average of the 
cash bonuses received by Employee for the two (2) fiscal years immediately 
prior to the Change of Control.

          2.     Employment Status.  No assurance is given to Employee that 
after a Change of Control he will in fact be retained by Berry, or its 
successor, or that he will have the same job classification.  Employee 
understands and acknowledges that Berry, or its successor, shall not be 
obligated in any way to Employee under the provisions of this Agreement if 
Employee resigns or is terminated by Berry, whether with or without cause, 
prior to the effective date of a Change of Control so long as employee's 
termination immediately prior to a change of control was not motivated by a 
bad faith intent to avoid the obligation arising under this agreement.

          3.     No Contract of Employment.  Nothing in this Agreement shall 
be construed or interpreted as creating any contract or agreement of 
employment or any right to continued employment with Berry.  This Agreement 
is not intended to confer upon Employee any right to notice of termination 
beyond that customarily given by Berry to its employees generally, or as may 
be set forth in any written employment agreement.  Any successor-in-interest 
of Berry shall be free to establish its own policies or procedures for notice
and termination of employment.

          4.     General Provisions.

                      (a)     Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein 
may be assigned by Employee.

                      (b)     This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall 
be enforceable against Berry, its successors-in-interest and assigns and the 
benefits hereunder shall accrue to Employee, his heirs, executors or 
administrators.

                     (c)     This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement 
between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and 
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, 
between them regarding the subject matter hereof.  This Agreement is intended 
to replace and supersede in its entirety that certain Salary Continuation 
Agreement dated ________________, between the parties hereto.

                     (d)     In the event of any claim, dispute or controversy
arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including an action for 
declaratory relief, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be
entitled to recover court costs and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses not 
limited to taxable costs, including, but not limited to, phone calls, 
photocopies, expert witness, travel, etc., and reasonable attorneys' fees to 
be fixed by the court.  Such recovery shall include court costs, out-of-pocket
expenses and attorneys' fees on appeal, if any.  The court shall determine who 
is the "prevailing party" whether or not the dispute or controversy proceeds 
to final judgment.  If either party is reasonably required to incur such 
out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees as a result of any claim arising 
out of or concerning this Agreement or any right or obligation derived 
hereunder, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover such 
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees whether or not an 
action is filed.

                      (e)     This Agreement shall be construed and governed by 
the laws, without regard to the laws as to choice or conflict of laws, of the 
State of California.  The parties hereto acknowledge that this Agreement was 
executed in Kern County, California.  By execution and delivery of this 
Agreement, the parties hereto agree and accept that any legal action or 
proceeding shall be brought in the federal or state courts for the State of 
California, County of Kern, and the parties expressly waive any objection to 
personal jurisdiction, venue or forum non conveniens.

                      (f)     This Agreement contains the entire agreement and 
understanding of the parties and may not be modified except by further written 
instrument.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement 
effective the date and year first above written.

                                                     BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY,
                                                     a Delaware corporation


                                            By: ___________________________
                                                                              
                                            Jerry V. Hoffman, Chairman of the
                                            Board, President and Chief
                                            Executive Officer
                                               
                                                                    "Berry"



                                                                                
                                              ______________________________
                                                                                
                                              
                                                                             
                                                                   "Employee"
 

 
 

                              EXHIBIT 10.2









                                     



                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statements of Berry Petroleum Company on Form S-8 (File No. 33-61337) 
of our report dated February 20, 1998 on our audits of the financial 
statements of Berry Petroleum Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 
and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, 
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Los Angeles, California
March 6, 1998






















                              EXHIBIT 23.1

                                    March 6, 1998



Berry Petroleum Company
P.O. Bin X
Taft, California 93268

Gentlemen:

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 1997, (the Annual Report) of Berry Petroleum Company (the 
Company), we hereby consent to (i) the use of and reference to (a) our report
dated February 19, 1998, entitled "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 1997, 
on Certain Property Interests owned by Berry Petroleum Company," which 
pertains to interests of the Company in certain oil and gas properties 
located in California, Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, and Wyoming; (b) our report 
dated February 12, 1997, entitled "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 1996, 
on Certain Property Interests owned by Berry Petroleum Company," which 
pertains to interests of the Company in certain oil and gas properties 
located in California, Louisiana, Nevada, and Texas; and (c) our report 
dated February 12, 1996, entitled "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 1995, 
on Certain Property Interests owned by Berry Petroleum Company," which 
pertains to interests of the Company in certain oil and gas properties 
located in California, Louisiana, Nevada, and Texas (collectively referred 
to as the "Reports"), under the caption "Oil and Gas Reserves - Reserve 
Reports" in items 1 and 2 of the Annual Report and under the caption 
"Supplemental Information About Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)
in item 8 of the Annual Report; and (ii) the use of and reference to the 
name DeGolyer and MacNaughton as the independent petroleum engineering firm 
that prepared the Reports under such items; provided, however, that since 
the cash-flow calculations in the Annual Report include estimated income 
taxes not included in the Reports, we are unable to verify the accuracy 
of the cash-flow values in the Annual Report.

                                    Very truly yours,



                                    DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON













                               Exhibit 23.2

  

5 0000778438 BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY 1,000 YEAR DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997 7,756 718 8,990 0 0 19,443 228,752 71,311 177,724 7,944 0 0 0 220 111,651 177,724 67,172 68,995 0 32,545 5,907 0 2,302 28,241 8,981 19,260 0 0 0 19,260 .88 .87
UNDERTAKING FOR FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

	For purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing Form 
S-8 (effective July 13, 1990) under the Securities Act of 1933, the Company 
hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by 
reference into the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 
(No. 33-61337 filed on July 27, 1995):

	Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities 
Act of 1933 may be permitted to director, officers and controlling persons 
of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the 
Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and 
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as 
expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.  
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities 
(other than the payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a 
director, officer or controlling person of the Company in the successful 
defense of any action, suit or proceeding is asserted by such director, 
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being 
registered, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the 
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of 
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification is against 
public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final 
adjudication of such issue.


























                                Exhibit 99.1